Monday, July 13, 2015

Full version of the country rankings in 2008 to give a positive impact on the world

Interesting country (the United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, China, Russia, North Korea) for, was also individual data will be posted. If you look fine, it is a feature of countries is interesting though noticeable.

Evaluation of America: assessment that country by the Americans "have a positive impact" is 56%. 36 percent is bad influence. Indeed. I also feel the country Manse, it seems the United States is the larger assessment that "have a bad influence."
By the way, the country "has given a bad influence" for the country is over 35%, was the United States only.

Evaluation of Japan: Japanese assessment that "Japan have a bad influence on the world" is as small as 15 percent. (Like Zenkyoto collapse of the baby boom, the influence of the Asahi newspaper, this is it is unlikely to become zero) "has given a positive impact" is also 36%. It's a humble superpower. But, certainly, "Japan has given a positive impact on the world!" As a shout loudly Japanese, it is not Poku Japanese, for better or worse.

Evaluation of Germany: the more than a "have a bad effect" is, Turkey and Egypt. Indeed. However, European countries it is generally the evaluation is high.

Evaluation of Russia: Egypt and China aside, the evaluation of the Russian country is too high (laughs).
And a low rating to the Japanese of Russia. Cormorant - no, speaking unexpectedly, surprising. A sense legitimate. European countries with the exception of the United Kingdom also, generally low rating. It started the natural gas supply problem, since it met the doom and gloom is to Putin, there is no wonder.

Evaluation of the UK: South Korea's assessment of the UK, the high of surprising is. Also surprising person of a low evaluation of Mexico than Argentina.

Evaluation of China: Chinese, and too country Manse. It is the result of obscurantist of policy by the Communist Party.
And, surprisingly and unexpectedly. Lowest rating to the Japanese in China (good effect, 12%). Legitimate too'll, Japanese. Although it harder Asahi newspaper as how much People's Daily Japan version, the intelligence is higher than the intellectuals towards the masses country, it there is a limit to brainwashing.
Evaluation of the Korean in China, even the "bad influence" is greater than the "good influence" good laugh. I I do not like Chinese Koreans really. Although the opposite direction of the evaluation also think the same. European countries Low Ratings Nanoha China across the board, well, of course.

Evaluation of North Korea: the proportion of "good influence" of the Japanese, I guess I'm a zero? I do not read well. Well, although I'm a surprise if not zero in reverse.
After the evaluation of the Korean compatriots in too low, I laughed.

Conclusion. Objective than the Americans thought, the Japanese too much humility. The obscurantist of policy has been successful, Russia and China.
Evaluation criteria. Eyes to see their own country, if different from the eyes of other countries see the country? Eye for a country, if different from the other countries.

Low Ratings to Americans of the United States> 36% low evaluation to foreigners of America> 48%
Highly rated> 36% foreigners high evaluation of Japan to the Japanese of Japan> 56%
Highly rated to the Russians of Russia> 78% high evaluation to foreigners in Russia> 37%
Highly rated> 90% foreigners high evaluation to China to the Chinese of China> 47%

But a high evaluation to China, Tibet, export product reliability devastating, in the nightmare of the Beijing Olympics (When you held), '09 Kana not cut the 40 percent? Something, rebelled against the teachings of Sun Tzu, I began losing by without a fight, the CCP is.